Wednesday, 4 February 2015
Peru regulates trade mark coexistence agreements so as to protect competition and consumers
In essence, a coexistence agreement may be valid and binding upon its parties only if it complies with criteria of acceptability under competition law and does not deceive consumers. Further, a set of minimum conditions have been stipulated for the purpose of ensuring that consumers are not confused.
A caveat for trade mark owners is that, while failure to satisfy the legal criteria is fatal to the acceptance and therefore the legal effect of a coexistence agreement, the fact that those criteria does not necessarily and automatically mean that the agreement will be legally acceptable.
Source: "INDECOPI releases binding administrative precedent on co-existence agreements", written by Catherine Escobedo (BARLAW - Barrera & Asociados, Lima) for World Trademark Review, 3 February 2015.
Ya está disponible para ser descargado el Boletín informativo del Instituto nacional de Propiedad Industrial de Chile Inapi, correspodien...
Como el tema del rescate de los mineros será recurrente durante un tiempo, bien vale la pena aclarar algunos datos especialmente relacionado...
Dos publicistas argentinos radicados en Paraguay, Luis Alberto Apesteguia y Luis Moreno, presentaron una demanda en Chile contra la admin...