Thursday, 10 March 2022
Wednesday, 10 February 2021

Call for Chapter *Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual property*
*Intangible Cultural
Heritage and Intellectual property*
If you have expertise in
these areas, I would love you to contribute to the book Transboundary Heritage and
Intellectual Property Law: Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage (Routledge, 2021)
You will be invited to write a chapter (8,000 words --
all inclusive: footnotes and bibliography). Drafts are due by the 31st of April
2021 (for internal peer-review purposes). If you would like to co-author the
piece with someone, this is also welcome.
To maximize the potential impact of the volume in
connecting transboundary heritage studies more firmly to intellectual property
law, I kindly ask you to consider a chapter on ‘ownership’ bearing in mind that
the book is interdisciplinary, so contemplate a reader that has no law
background. I ask you to reflect on the following matters when drafting your
chapter:
1. Concepts of property rights, possession rights and
responsibilities; including collective rights, and control access. This should
focus on key legal concepts.
2. Desires for access and control over traditional
knowledge, and genetic resources.
3. Traditional proprietary system and how they operate
in different contexts, for instance: civil law, common law, national law,
international law, and customary law.
4. How does the law operate in practice in relation to
transboundary intangible cultural heritage?
5. What are the flaws of the system? Suggestions to
improve are welcome.
6. Please provide short examples if possible or you
can develop the chapter on a case study.
Finally, if you would like to contribute, please
submit an abstract of 400 words to me by the 8th of March, 2021. This will
allow the editor to give some guidance at the early stages of preparation of
the manuscript. In your abstract, please include the central thesis and the
structure. Also, include a short biography and contact details.
Patricia
Covarrubia
patricia.covarrubia@buckingham.ac.uk
Tuesday, 5 March 2019

How Venezuelan Crisis affects IP owners
By Alvaro R. Bonilla. Founder BR Latin American IP LLC
You have probably never heard about the Petro, a cryptocurrency launched in October 2018 by the government of Venezuela as a measure to fight against an out of control inflation of more than 1.000.000%.
The "Petro" was launched about a year after the "Rabbit Plan" didn't work out. The "Rabbit Plan" was a national campaign for people to raise rabbits in their houses so they could have access to animal protein, something very scarce in once the richest country of Latin America. The plan did not meet the expectations as most people were not capable of killing what became their furry pet.Well, now Petro has become the payment method for official fees for foreign IP applicants, but there is more than a catch with this.
How did we get to this point?
First, the Chavist Venezuelan government has never been a fan of Intellectual Property. In fact, they are against any private property and even more if it is an income producer private property.
For years the Venezuelan IP authority, the SAPI, became a black box were applications were filed but nothing happened. Not even a single patent was granted for many years.
One day, following the example of their socialist friends in Ecuador, they discovered that they could make a good amount of money charging incredible high official fees to foreign applicants.
The SAPI opened bank accounts in the US and later in Puerto Rico to receive payments from foreign applicants as it was not possible for them to pay in the local currency.
Later, as the Venezuela huge humanitarian, economic, social, political and international crisis became a regional problem, the US government started to impose sanctions against their regime.

The time when the SAPI was receiving thousands of dollars for a single patent annuity came to an end as their US-based bank accounts got closed.
On February 2nd, 2018, the Venezuelan Patent and Trademark Office (SAPI) advised the public to stop making registration related fee payments in foreign currency until the authorities could clarify the exchange rate to be applied. In fact, their official exchange rate is so distorted that if used applicants will end up paying pennies for their applications.
On August 23, 2018, the SAPI approved a new set of fees that represented a price increase of 142,000%, a move that sparked outrage among the IP community in Venezuela, with several of its leaders calling for the repeal of the measure.
On top of this, the SAPI entered back in low-activity mode, virtually halting the IP registration proceedings.
The situation did not change much until February 1st, 2019, when the SAPI published a new set of fees, which ended the year-long suspension of payments enacted on February 2018.
Not all was good news: according to the SAPI announcement, foreign applicants and right owners would have to make their payments in "Petros", the government-sponsored cryptocurrency.
Legal challenges have been announced against the measure, but their success is far from guaranteed.
The SAPI directive meant a new hurdle for US-based applicants, since on March 19th, 2018 the US government had issued an executive order effectively prohibiting any US person or within the US to provide financing for or otherwise deal in "any digital currency, digital coin, or digital token that was issued by, for, or on behalf of the Government of Venezuela on or after January 9, 2018."
So foreign applicants are now in a delicate situation if they do not use the Petros they might lose their IP rights in Venezuela. But if they use them to pay their fees they are at high risk of getting a sanction from the US.
Even though the "Petros" payment platform is not yet available for the general public, we recommend our clients to seek regulatory advice in their countries in order to avoid potential risks.
As with everything now in Venezuela we are not sure what is going to happen. At least we know for sure that as the "rabbit plan" is no longer working we will not have to pay official fees with rabbits.
Wednesday, 14 February 2018

Perú y Australia suscriben TLC
Además del evidente impacto tributario, el tratado aborda los siguientes asuntos en materia de Propiedad Intelectual:
- La promoción de la protección eficiente, adecuada y balanceada, así como la ejecución de los derechos de Propiedad Intelectual.
- El trato nacional, que asegura que los propietarios de derechos de ambos países reciban el mismo trato que los nacionales peruanos y australianos.
- El establecimiento de mecanismos para facilitar la cooperación entre Australia y el Perú, en relación con la protección y ejecución de la propiedad intelectual.
- La promoción de transparencia de los sistemas de propiedad intelectual, facilitando a los agentes económicos para obtener información sobre derechos existentes.
- El reforzamiento de la centralidad del Acuerdo sobre los Aspectos de los Derechos de Propiedad Intelectual relacionados con el Comercio (ADPIC) y los tratados de la Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual.
El tratado entrará en vigor 60 días luego de que las partes intercambien notificaciones certificando que han completado los procedimientos legales respectivos o en cualquier intercambio de notificaciones que las partes acuerden.
Monday, 11 December 2017

Food for thought
Under the session Tangible and Intangible and under the title: 'Intellectual Property and the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Emerging Themes and Challenges in Transboundary and Diaspora Contexts' I submitted a proposal that may be of interest to you [and I definitely will need your help with this paper]. In this proposal I am linking Intangible Heritage, Intellectual Property and Latin America.
You perhaps have heard that back in 2009, UNESCO supported the project to safeguard the intangible cultural heritage of the ‘Aymara’ communities of Bolivia, Chile and Peru. This was to be a 5 year project and I have not heard much about how did it go i.e. has this improved Aymara’s TK?
The Decision of the Intergovernmental Committee 4.COM 15B here, aimed to identify and prepare a catalogue of the Aymara’s TK [excited to read this catalogue (anyone?)]; it also involved to promote and disseminate Aymara’s oral and musical expressions, and moreover to support TK on the production of textile arts.
Here you have then an idea of what a proposal looks like or at least starts as…just put your minds to work and hopefully I will see you in China.
Original post here.
Tuesday, 18 July 2017

Free Webinar: Protecting your Brand Abroad: Understanding the IP Landscape of Latin America
Webinar: Protecting your Brand Abroad: Understanding the IP Landscape of Latin America
Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017
Time: 15.00h (Brussels time)
Location: Online
Admission: Free (registration required here)
Language: English

