Welcome to our blog for Intellectual Property Law and Practice in Latin America!
¡Bienvenidos a nuestro blog de Derecho y Práctica de la Propiedad Intelectual en Latinoamérica!
Bem-vindo ao nosso blog sobre Direito e Prática de Propriedade Intelectual na América Latina!

Tuesday 1 February 2011

Patricia Covarrubia

A cheese solution: is this healthy for a FTA?


From Marques Class 46 blog I read that the Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano has submitted in Colombia an application for recognition of its Parmigiano Reggiano as an Appelation of Origin (AO).

Colombia being part of the Andean Community of Nation (formed by Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru) operates a customs union similar to the EU and it boasts a common IP regime governed by Decision 486. Geographical Indication is found under Title XII and AO definition under Art 201, regulating though this subject.

Under the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) signed between the EU and Colombia and Peru, Parmiggiano Reggiano appears on the list (more than 200 products are listed – only 4 are from Colombia and Peru). Looking further the FTA, under title VII named Geographical Indications (GI), clarifies that GI of a Party to be protected by the other Party, shall only be subject to this Title if they are recognised and declared as such in the country of origin. This implies that the parties each accept that the other party’s domestic examinations are also sufficient for their domestic market. As we may know Parmiggiano Reggiano not only enjoys protection in its own country but in the whole European Union (also in those Members States that are parties to the Lisbon Agreement since this GI has been registered under this regime).

That said, here comes my questioning: why is the Consorzio looking for this further protection? There is the issue that though the FTA has been signed, it has not entered into force as yet -- is this a sign? I feel that this cheese does not smell right.

Moreover, will the other 228 EU products apply for this recognition? Or is just this stinky cheese that wants to have another slice of protection?

Patricia Covarrubia

Patricia Covarrubia


Write comments
2 February 2011 at 13:03 delete

The reason that the Consorzio decided to proceed - last November 2010 - with a paralle request for recognition of the appellation of origin Parmigiano Reggiano, is the high number of violations detected in Colombia, while the FTA - despite being signed in May 2010 - has not yet entered into force.

I am afraid that Patricia so far only tried the fake Colombian cheeses; otherwise she would not have used the word "stinky" as she would have known that Parmesan cheese, being a hard cheese, does not smell at all.

2 February 2011 at 19:32 delete

I do agree that the Consorzio wants to protect its GI but my questioning is the whole FTA. How long will it take for the GI to be registered? and in the same line, how long will it take the FTA to enter into force?
Both of them are unpredictable. Because of this, I feel that it is not a good sign for the FTA: will it ever be in forced? Remember that the FTA between Colombia and the US was agreed many years ago and...well still waiting.
That said, the'stinky' was used as a metaphor -- as it doesn't smell right (re. to the FTA - will it ever be in forced?)
Thanks for starting this debate, I would love to hear from more people and their views -- someone appointed me to the Vienna Convention, any views?