The Fourth Chamber of the STJ unanimously upheld the appeal brought by the Brazilian Insituto Nacional da Propiedade Industrial (INPI) regarding the dismissal to extend three pharmaceutical patents.
While this decision appears to have taken place back in December, it has recently been published by the Brazilian Superior Court (STJ).
The decision goes in line with previous ones and confirms the understanding of the pipeline system used by the patent system in Brazil i.e. term of the patent is to be count from the first application abroad even in circumstances in which such application was abandoned or extended in another country. We may recall that Brazil did not grant patent protection to pharmaceutical and agricultural products BUT because of its commitments as part of the TRIPS agreement, there was the need to accommodate the national system.
The drugs:
2. - drug used as a veterinary anti-parasitic; active ingredient selamectin. Patent to expire on 18/01/2013; extension sought until 12/01/2014.
3.-drug for migraine; active ingredient bromide eletriptan. Patent to expire on 15/10/2010; extension sought until 13/08/2013.
Source INPI.
Welcome to IPTango
Popular Posts | Last 30 days
-
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) will hold the Tenth Session of the WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property and Front... -
Ayer se anunció la publicación de la 17ª edición del Índice Mundial de Innovación ( GII , por sus siglas en inglés). Publicado desde 2007, ... -
Roberto Gómez Bolaños , creador de los famosos personajes como ‘El Chavo del 8’ y ‘El Chapulín Colorado”, falleció el pasado 28 de noviembre... -
En Colombia el Tribunal Superior de Barranquilla le dio la razón al escritor Gabriel García Márquez (Premio Nobel de Literatura, 1982) en un... -
El Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Ciudad de México determinó que Eduardo Moreno Laparade, sobrino de Cantinflas, es el "único y le...
-
The official theme of the 2010 South African World Cup is under debate. The singer and songwriter, Wilfrido Vargas, accused Shakira of plagi... -
For some years, the Mexican producers of tequila have manifested disagreement with the use of the word ‘tequila’ in ‘Desperados’ one of the...
-
El pasado 10 de diciembre de 2013 se celebraron los primeros 20 años del Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial ( IMPI ). El IMPI ... -
On 21 February 2024 , FIDE (Legal and Business Research Foundation) and TIPSA (Transatlantic Intellectual Property Academy) will hold the ... -
The World Intellectual Property Organization ( WIPO ) will hold the Ninth Session of the WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property and Fro...
Approved by the IPKat
IPTango is an approved blog by the IPKat
Creative Commons (CC BY-NC)
IPTango licenses the use of this blog posts under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). IPTango autoriza el uso de las publicaciones de este blog bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC).
2 comments
Write commentsI don't understand the sentence in the post, about the need to accommodate the national system, which appears to suggest (incorrectly) that pipeline patents were required to conform to TRIPS.
ReplyTRIPS clarify that inventions include both: products and processes and that members cannot discriminate against inventions in a specific field of technology. This means that Brazil as a member of TRIPS cannot deny patents to inventions in the field of medicine as it did before joining the TRIPS. That said, Brazil needed to amend its legislation to provide protection.
ReplyThe pipeline system is a protection that was adopted due political pressure from developed countries (Scott Harrison). This system provides patents to inventions that were 'in the pipeline' of development when new laws were put into place for patentability of medicines.
In other words, in Brazil the pipeline system protects a medical patent that otherwise would not be patentable before or after the new patent law.
Before: the law did not allow it
After: novelty was destroyed
Hope this clarify any misunderstanding.